All seized crypto assets, wallets, and related equipment will be forfeited to the State Treasury.
Asset forfeiture for crypto violations in Nepal is the legal mechanism the Nepali state uses to seize digital assets that are linked to criminal cryptocurrency activity. The country’s outright ban on all crypto operations means any breach can trigger a seizure, hefty fines, and prison time. Below you’ll find a practical walk‑through of the legal backdrop, how confiscation actually works, and what you can do to protect yourself if you’re operating near Nepal’s borders.
Since 2017, Nepal’s criminal code has defined cryptocurrency as any electronic token, code, or virtual asset created through cryptography that holds commercial value or can store wealth. The definition is deliberately broad, ensuring that every digital currency - from Bitcoin to newer DeFi tokens - falls under the prohibition.
The Muluki Criminal Code Act2017 (Section262A) criminalizes the creation, possession, trading, mining, or storage of such assets. Enforcement is overseen by two key bodies:
Both agencies report directly to the Ministry of Finance, which coordinates with the police and the Anti‑Money Laundering Department to pursue violations.
Although Nepal has not published a dedicated crypto‑forfeiture handbook, the process mirrors that used for traditional financial crimes:
Because blockchain transactions are immutable, authorities rely heavily on wallet address clustering and IP‑address logs provided by internet service providers (ISPs) to link activity to a physical individual.
Under the Anti‑Money Laundering Act, crypto‑related offenses are treated as serious financial crimes. The typical penalty package includes:
These punishments are designed to deter both domestic users and transnational actors from using Nepal as a crypto hub.
If you’re considering any crypto‑related activity while physically in Nepal, the safest route is to avoid it entirely. Below are concrete steps to mitigate risk:
For businesses, the only viable blockchain applications are those that do not involve a token of value - such as supply‑chain tracking or digitized record‑keeping - provided they never exchange any crypto for payment.
Only a handful of emerging markets maintain a total crypto ban. Nepal sits at the extreme end of the spectrum, while neighbors have adopted more nuanced approaches.
Country | Legal Status of Crypto | Asset Forfeiture Rules | Typical Penalties |
---|---|---|---|
Nepal | Complete ban (illegal to mine, trade, store, or possess) | Handled under general criminal asset forfeiture law; no crypto‑specific procedure | Fine up to NPR5M, 1-5years imprisonment, full asset seizure |
India | Regulated - allowed with licensing, taxation, and AML compliance | Specific crypto‑forfeiture provisions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act | Fine up to INR10M, up to 3years imprisonment |
Bangladesh | Ban on trading and payments, but mining sometimes tolerated | Crypto assets treated as illicit property; seizure possible | Fine up to BDT1M, up to 2years imprisonment |
Sri Lanka | Regulated exchange licensing, tax on gains | Explicit crypto‑asset forfeiture rules under the Financial Crimes Act | Fine up to LKR5M, up to 3years imprisonment |
These differences highlight why Nepal’s approach is viewed as an outlier, especially as the global trend leans toward regulated adoption.
No. The Muluki Criminal Code Act 2017 classifies any possession, trade, mining, or storage of cryptocurrency as a criminal offense. Even a small amount in a personal wallet can trigger legal action.
Authorities will obtain a court order, copy the wallet’s private keys (if stored on the device), and transfer the tokens to a government-controlled wallet. The original device is kept as evidence, and the assets are listed in the forfeiture order.
Yes, the convicted party can file an appeal within 30days of the judgment. The appeal must challenge either the conviction itself or the valuation method used for the seized crypto assets.
Cooperation varies. Exchanges based in jurisdictions with strong AML treaties (e.g., the US, EU) are more likely to share KYC data. However, many offshore platforms claim no jurisdiction over Nepali users and may not comply.
Yes, non‑financial blockchain applications such as supply‑chain tracking, land‑registry digitization, and health‑record management are permitted, provided they do not involve a native cryptocurrency or token of value.
Understanding crypto asset forfeiture Nepal is essential for anyone living in or traveling through the country. The legal environment is clear: digital currencies are banned, violations are criminal, and the state can seize any related assets. Until the government revises its stance, the safest play is to stay out of crypto activities while on Nepali soil.
Write a comment
Your email address will be restricted to us